SAMPLES: RATING SCALES, CATEGORIES AND PERFORMANCE STATEMENTS TO BE RATED, OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS AND RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION CATEGORIES
The following samples are, for the most part, taken from surveys that have been used in past reviews. The categories of questions relate to the core performance criteria. Included are performance statements to be used with an appropriate rating scale and possible open-ended questions. Sample rating scales for surveys are also given. The last idea is for respondent identification categories.
To the extent that you are in a position to observe, please indicate your evaluation of each aspect of performance listed below, by circling the number of the most appropriate response, as follows:
The items below characterize the major responsibilities of this position. Please rate by circling the most appropriate response:
Option 1
· Strongly Disagree
· Disagree
· Agree
· Strongly Agree
· Unable to Evaluate
Option 2
· Poor
· Fair
· Average
· Good
· Excellent
· Unable to evaluate
Option 3
· 1 (Poor) – 10 (Excellent)
Option 4
· 1 (Poor) – 5 (Outstanding)
Option 5
· 5 Exceptional
· 4 Exceeds expectations
· 3 Meets expectations
· 2 Marginal
· 1 Unsatisfactory
· NA Not applicable/unknown
Option 6
· 1 Poor
· 2 Fair
· 3 Average
· 4 Good
· 5 Excellent
· U Unable to Observe
Options 3-6 (an additional statement that may be added): “Please provide comments or explanations for all ratings of 1 or 2. Comments on any rating, however, are welcomed.”
Rated
Statements
·
Accepts
personal responsibility for his/her decisions and actions
·
Anticipates
problems and facilitates the development of solutions to those problems
·
Approaches
problems with clarity, logic, coolness and makes decisions based on facts
·
Can be
trusted
·
Consistently
looks for better ways of doing things
·
Consults
and works effectively with leadership and staff to introduce new ideas,
concepts, proposals for improvement of services
·
Contributes
to high morale among faculty, staff and students
·
Creates
or maintains a vision; sense of direction; sets priorities for action;
coordinate members' work; maintains high performance standards
·
Deals
honestly and openly with others
·
Demonstrates
a commitment to academic excellence
·
Demonstrates
commitment to quality instruction at all levels of the curriculum
·
Demonstrates
integrity; recognizes and rewards accomplishments of all members; creates a
climate of respect and high morale; facilitates members' professional
development
·
Demonstrates
the ability to facilitate conflict resolutions
·
Demonstrates
wisdom in appointment, promotion and continuous appointment decisions and other
personnel decisions
·
Develops
effective solutions to organizational problems and takes into account all
relevant information
·
Effectively
encourages faculty scholarship
·
Exhibits
forward thinking in setting short and long term goals and is prepared and able
to make tough decisions
·
Frames
a shared vision within the college/unit
·
Has a
plan of action which is democratically developed and openly communicated
·
Has
maintained and improved the physical environment of the unit
·
Has
provided leadership for high quality academic programs
·
Helps
create a climate of support for innovation, new approaches, and new ideas
·
Is a
good leader
·
Is
successful in seeking funding from alumni, foundations, the business community,
etc.
·
Is
supportive of student activities
·
Maintains
an effective research support structure that facilitates faculty development
and the ability to conduct research
·
Motivates
others by providing them with recognition, encouragement, constructive
criticism and other feedback
·
Participates
in activities that promote professional growth and development
·
Positions
are clear and consistent
·
Recognizes
and responds effectively to unexpected situations, handles crises and stress
calmly and effectively
·
Recognizes
good ideas, supports them, and challenges the system to get new ideas adopted
·
Successfully
recruits new faculty congruent with future goals and objectives
·
Treats
individuals and units fairly
·
Please
describe his/her skills and strengths as well as areas to improve in his/her
role. You might consider his/her skills
as a motivator and manager, his/her ability to promote and maintain high
academic standards, and his/her ability to articulate a vision and goals for
the organization. Give concrete
examples whenever possible.
·
From
your observation, does he/she provide leadership and vision for the University
of Minnesota?
· Actively recruits and promotes women, minorities, and veterans; creates an environment conducive to the productivity and retention of the groups
·
Creates
an environment that seeks understanding and respect for all
·
Demonstrates
effective recruitment, retention and promotion of persons from historically
under-represented groups
·
Demonstrates
respect for his/her colleagues and their ideas and suggestions
·
Exercises
leadership on issues of diversity
·
Exhibits
respect for all
·
Fosters
an environment that seeks understanding and respect for all
·
Demonstrates
a commitment to diversity
·
Demonstrates
commitment to the university goal of cultural, ethnic, racial and gender
diversity
·
Maintains
a strong program of affirmative action and equal opportunity in all areas
·
Manages
differences among people with skill and sensitivity
·
Seeks
understanding of self and others as part of fostering people working together
more effectively
Rated
Statements
·
Actively
recruits excellent personnel; designs and conducts appropriate evaluations;
makes effective and fair assignments; appropriately supervises civil service
and administrative staff; distributes rewards fairly and takes action on low
performance
·
Allocates
resources (funds, travel, space) or retrenchments in a fair and reasoned
manner; maintains appropriate fiscal solvency
·
Appropriately
delegates responsibility
·
Assists
members in seeking funds; supports members' interaction with other scholars;
recognizes and rewards excellent research; provides resources for research
·
Considers
a variety of factors and/or consequences when making decisions
·
Consults
members in a timely and meaningful manner; new ideas are generated and used;
delegates authority and responsibility appropriately; keeps members informed;
makes timely decisions
·
Deals
fairly and impartially with employees
·
Delegates
responsibility and authority appropriately
·
Delegates
responsibility and authority appropriately to others within the unit based on
the unit’s constitution
·
Demonstrates
a desire to promote the financial welfare and general well-being of the staff
·
Demonstrates
ability to do fundraising, including working with university leadership and the
state legislature
·
Demonstrates
effective verbal and written communication skills
·
Effectively
assigns responsibility to others
·
Efficiently
manages institutional resources
·
Encourages
openness and two-way communication
·
Encourages
participation by those affected in the formulation and implementation of
policies
·
Encourages
professional development
·
Enhances
sense of community and team work within the unit
·
Establishes
credibility by showing integrity and keeping his/her word
·
Establishes
proper priorities in allocation of financial resources
·
Exhibits
decisiveness in actions to execute strategic plans, with appropriate levels of
information
·
Expects
exemplary levels of performance from self and subordinates
·
Facilitates
curriculum examination; supports teaching improvement efforts; recognizes and
rewards effective teaching; provides resources to support teaching
·
Has
maintained a balance between student services’ needs and academic needs
·
Is able
to efficiently organize responsibilities for him/herself and his/her staff
·
Is an
effective manager
·
Keeps
subordinates, superiors and others informed; obtains and then passes on
information to those who need to know
·
Maintains
efficiency through delegation of responsibilities
·
Maintains
effective oversight of internal fiscal affairs
·
Manages
human, financial and physical resources to increase organizational
effectiveness in delivering services
·
Manages
resources to increase units organizational effectiveness
·
Offers
encouragement, support and recognition to staff
·
Provides
clear direction, expectations and feedback to staff and colleagues as projects
activities progress
·
Provides
for adequate support services
·
Provides
opportunity for staff input for decision-making
·
Provides
the necessary leadership to develop and initiate effective program and service
improvements
·
Seeks
input from staff and colleagues
·
Sets
appropriate priorities to accomplish planned projects on time
·
Tolerates
disagreement in professional and operational matters
·
Uses
appropriate methods for performance evaluation of staff
·
Uses
sound management principles resulting in consistent, non-capricious decisions
·
From
your observation or experience, does he/she appropriately delegate authority?
·
From
your observation or experience, does he/she reward, support and empower his/her
employees?
·
Please
describe his/her skills and strengths as well as areas to improve in
organization, management, allocating resources, making effective use of
people's talents and energies (including promotion of faculty and fostering the
development of staff), and in other related areas. Give concrete examples whenever possible.
Functional
Competence
Rated
Statements
·
Accomplishes
agendas and/or reaches decisions in a timely, efficient and effective manner
·
Demonstrates
effective time-management and priority setting skills
·
Demonstrates
necessary knowledge, skill, and understanding to carry out the responsibilities
of his/her position
·
Gets
things done in a timely and efficient way
·
Is
service oriented
·
Keeps
abreast of developments in the field
·
Maintains
personal and collegiate visibility within profession, both locally and
nationally
·
Maintains
visibility within the profession
·
Makes
timely decisions based on fact
·
Provides
sound professional advice and information to staff
·
Reaches
sound conclusions after reviewing available information
·
Structures
effective strategic plans to meet goals
·
Uses
creative approaches in problem solving
·
Uses
good reasoning in matters that call for judgement decisions
Interpersonal Skills
Rated
Statements
·
Communicates
effectively with faculty and staff; keeps lines of communication open
·
Communicates
effectively with internal constituencies (students/staff/faculty)
·
Communicates
effectively within the university, with external constituencies and with
faculty, staff and students
·
Deals
with others honestly and openly
·
Demonstrates
effective conflict resolution skills
·
Demonstrates
effective verbal and written skills in individual and group settings
·
Demonstrates
respect for staff and their ideas/suggestions
·
Demonstrates
stability in mental and emotionally stressful situations
·
Demonstrates
the ability to work cooperatively and harmoniously with staff
·
Develops
and maintains smooth and effective working relationships with superiors, peers
and subordinates
·
Establishes
a service orientation to those who are directly affected by the office
·
Establishes
rapport and puts individuals and groups at ease
·
Has
good interpersonal skills in relation to others
·
Has
maintained a relationship with university alumni
·
Has
positive and productive interactions with the professional community, alumni
and other key external groups, the general public and state and local
government
·
Has
respect of his/her colleagues (faculty, staff, administration)
·
Is an
effective spokesperson for the unit
·
Is
empathetic and responsive to students’ concerns and problems
·
Keeps
the community appropriately informed
·
Listens
actively and acknowledges communication
·
Maintains
liaison with appropriate constituent groups and professional organizations;
represents unit's interests to upper levels of the organization
·
Maintains
objectivity under fire
·
Manages
conflict effectively
·
Recognizes
expertise in others and effectively uses their thoughts, ideas, and information
·
Represents
the unit to university central administration and the board of regents
·
Responds
constructively to suggestions from staff and customers
·
Understands
the major issues facing the university and the unit
·
Viewed
as a “team player”
·
Works
effectively as part of a team, in partnerships and with individuals
·
Works
effectively with faculty governance groups to create a shared vision of the
unit
·
Works
effectively with student governance groups to create a shared vision of the
unit
From your
experience, does he/she work well with University of Minnesota administration
and staff?
Summary evaluation
Rated
Statements
·
Communicator:
clearly represents the views and decisions of others, as well as his/her own
·
Leader:
merits the respect and loyalty of others
·
Manager:
efficiently and responsibly gets things done
·
Motivator:
strives to develop a team effort to serve the best interests of the institution
·
Planner:
anticipates problems, needs and opportunities
·
Carries
out his/her responsibilities with understanding and efficiency
·
Considering
all the above leadership behaviors and unit outcomes you have observed, rate
this leader's overall performance
·
On a
scale of 1 to 10, how would you summarize his/her performance in his/her
position
·
Based
on your direct knowledge working with him/her in his/her role in this position,
how well do you feel you are able to evaluate his/her performance?
·
As you
evaluate him/her, are there any additional observations or comments concerning
strengths or areas to improve which you would like to add to make this review
complete and more representative of your views?
·
Overall,
how would you rate him/her in his/her performance in this position?
·
Please
describe his/her skills and strengths as well as areas to improve in the
following: a) development of diversity, b) ability to foster collaborative
projects internally and externally, c) other areas of responsibility. Give
concrete examples to support your judgments whenever possible.
·
Identify
areas for improvement
·
What
are the administrative strengths of this individual?
·
What
are the administrative weaknesses of this individual?
·
What do
you feel have been his/her major contributions during this review period?
·
What
recommendations do you have to enhance his/her performance?
·
What
suggestions can you make for the improvement of this individual’s
administrative performance?
The name of the SA Director could be
substituted for his/her or he/she as appropriate.