SPACE REASSIGNMENT PROPOSALS
April 2002
|
AREA |
SUBMITTER |
DESCRIPTION |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Holsinger-Fuchs, Pamela |
Description Re-Location Haunted House To Residence life Storage AODAP Dowell
113 Campus Ministry 102
Dowell Game Room equipment Distribute to Residence halls Ballroom Store
chairs, stage and tables in garages (need for sale to be held
this spring) TV Room Donate
old TV SPACE Equipment Kiehle
Storage Conference Room Table/chairs
to Dowell 102 Lounge furniture & big screen Morsel’s Multicultural Lounge Current
Help desk Multicultural Office Help
desk SPACE Dowell 102 CSA Dowell
117 Habitat for Humanity Dowell
102 Service Learning Dowell 102 Student Activities Dowell
102 Bede Info Desk/Copier Dowell 102 Resource Room/Rentals Computer Storage Post Office Robertson Bookstore Robertson Student Health (running water) Dowell
119 (close to two bathrooms) ITV Dowell
110 (until summer 2003) Dowell 116 will not be available because of cost of relocating
fiber optics. Financial
considerations: ·
Move security camera (bookstore and lounge-rewire to
Robertson) ·
Moving all furniture including bookstore? Plant services
or contracted service? ·
Remodel of Robertson for bookstore and building in
mailboxes (use front loading mailboxes temporarily?) ·
Wireless costs? Lounge spaces: ·
Love seat and chairs on 2nd floor Dowell both
ends with LAN outlets. (Wiring costs?) Meeting rooms: ·
SCC 108 ·
HRI room to be used as a regularly scheduled meeting room ·
Brown Dining Room A permanently set up to replace Bede
conference room |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Knowlton, Doug |
1. small office
space for an office of interdisciplinary research; 2. Space
for a resource center and office for a global studies |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Knowlton, Doug |
After
Jeff Sinks and I consulted we felt that the best approach at this time was to
configure the space that was initially designated for the CIO position to be
an office space that could initially be used by Dan Lim but that we may have
some different needs for that space at some time in the future and that also
has something to do with Dan's needs and faculty offices. Jeff was also
looking into the placement of a temp wall in the Help desk office space that
would facilitate that space being used as two separate offices. So at this
time the space should be designated for Dan. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Knowlton, Doug |
Health Sciences curriculum
director office |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Thomasson, Jim; Demuth, David |
Purpose: develop and support a research culture at UMC by
providing services to identify and develop funding opportunities for the
faculty, staff, and students. Proposal: Ideally we
request two (2) office spaces, e.g. in the Kiehle complex or Selvig Hall 208
(Research Center) and 205 (office for DeMuth), or perhaps Dowell Annex 250
(Research Center) and 248 (office for DeMuth), one to house a new initiative
vital to the work of faculty, a Center for Faculty Research, and an adjacent
office to serve as the personal office for Dr. DeMuth, whose current office
is inadequate to support the level of student project work he encourages. [Selvig
205, in proximity to Rand Rasmussen’s office, would provide one natural
alliance for work of the Center.
Dowell Annex 248 and 250, with adjoining interior door, would allow
DeMuth’s office to open directly to the Research Center.] Infrastructure: desks and workspace in Center for DeMuth,
Thomasson, and an assistant; 2 additional work stations for visiting
faculty/students working on grant projects.
[Minimal desired workspace: 50 sq. ft. per researcher, or 250 sq. ft.,
with additional space for shelves, files, work table for small workshops,
bulletin board, and related materials.] Network: 8 ports minimum [ideally 10] to support 1
web server, 1 network printer, 3 primary laptops, and 3-5 for visitors with
laptops, allowing for Center/guest researchers for small workshops. Rationale: A
fundamental weakness pervades academic programming at many colleges and
universities, especially small regional private colleges and under-funded
branches of major state universities.
Put in simple terms: they have no developed “culture of
research”. By research most
professors refer to the work they do to keep up—at least keep abreast or
ahead of the students—in their field.
Certainly, there are individuals who pursue projects of sponsored
research, but they constitute a very small percentage of the overall faculty. This
absence of a “culture of research” is glaringly obvious at the University of
Minnesota, Crookston, to both those within and outside observers. In response to a recent application for
center funding to a TC competition, we drew two interesting responses from
reviewers: “The clearly stated goal is to get UMC faculty
talking about research and how to incorporate it into their work - an
extremely important goal.” “This is a risky proposal - building a research
culture in a school that has focused on teaching is tough work. However, the future
of the campus demands some incorporation of research if the school is
to reach its potential as a solid four-year institution that can send its
students on to graduate programs.” [Emphasis ours] The usefulness of such a center at UMC and to
UMC is obvious. That it is perceived
within the broader University system as both a weakness and a necessity is
also clear. A significant part of the
movement from a 2-year “technical” college to a full-fledged polytechnic
component of a major 4-year + graduate research university is incorporating
research into teaching and publication. A “culture
of research” is grounded in continuing, broad-based scholarship both within
and across disciplines. It
plumbs the depths of the methods and content within a discipline or field,
and it extends beyond itself to the breadth of collision and integration with
other disciplines. The contemporary
examples are multiple and obvious: bio-chemistry, astrophysics,
biomedicalethics, ethnomusicology, agroeconomics, to
name a few. This critical movement,
called dialectic, from breadth to depth to integration
to application, is the intellectual spine that supports the body of
knowledge from its foundation to the heights of emboldened inquiry. A truly polytechnic
education both invites and requires such a dialectical foundation. No application can be made in a context
where foundations have not been adequately laid, nor the noetic structure plumbed
or stretched by exciting, continuing scholarship. Clearly,
scholarship undertaken to refresh and inform oneself within one’s field of
inquiry is important. It is an expected
function of drawing salary as a professor.
It is homework; but it is not research. It is a performance requirement for
a professor—a job action, if you will. There is
another kind of scholarship. It is
aimed at expanding the horizons of knowledge. One draws from the breadth/depth/integration of one’s knowledge
to reach beyond the limits. Its goals
are novelty, enhancement, and creativity-- hypothesis longing for
verification, conceptualization reaching for application, stark calculation
finding a measure of release in poetry.
This kind of scholarship advances knowledge beyond the current reach
of disciplines. In the
first kind of scholarship we inform ourselves in order to better prepare our
students. In the second we seek to
inform our colleagues and advance our common and shared quest. At UMC there is no clarification of the expectations
of or balance between so-called “publication research” and “teaching
research”, nor between research involving “general preparation” [a
professor’s “homework”] and “original, exploratory” work of research. [That
latter distinction is derived from the AAUP statement on the role of
re-search in faculty workload determination.] Even the
stamp of approval—Doctor of Philosophy in this or that—is a
marker. It is conferred when one has
demonstrated a level of mastery of the methods and content of a certain
discipline or field of inquiry, but it carries with it a burdensome expectation
as well—I am a lover of wisdom, off, sword in hand, to take a slice out of
the under-belly of ignorance, destined to search for the “why” that lies
beyond the “what”. Those who
do research, seeking to push back that frontier of unknowing, are scholars. They seek out a community of scholars. The community they seek participates in a
“culture of research”. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dowell |
2000 Space Committee Recommendation |
As the UMC
computer center and instructional technology center move from Dowell Hall to
Kiehle Hall upon completion of the Kiehle renovation, certain vacated space
will be converted to classrooms.
Specifically Dowell 102 and 110 would be converted from department/office
space to classrooms. LAN,
electricity, desks, chairs, instructor stations, and projection equipment
would be installed into these rooms. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dowell |
Sherven, Peg |
Dowell 104 (the
current help desk), DH113A (notebook storage room) and DH113B (Doc's work
area) DH117 (Jeff Sperling's office) will potentially be available by
next fall. If we cannot move to the new facility by the first week of
August, the rooms won't be available. DH116:
Apparently, the various cabling in the back of the room is too expensive/cumbersome
to move (T3, NETS, switches, patch panels), so this room will NOT be
available. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dowell |
Sinks, Jeff |
I saw that DH
116 (the server room) listed as a space to possibly be reassigned. A significant
amount of networking infrastructure will have to remain in DH 116 unless we
are able to raise several hundred thousand dollars to implement new fiber
runs & switches to campus buildings. DH116 is not likely to be
available for reassignment in the next year or 2. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dowell |
Sinks, Jeff |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dowell 102 |
Odom, Marsha |
I hadn't considered it my place to request that DH 102 be
returned to classroom use. I had understood that was going to occur as
a matter of fact. Since I see that others are asking for that space, I would like
to find out it DH 102 is truly up for grabs, or is it already designated for
classroom space and cannot be part of this discussion? In any case, I am now speaking for DH102 to be returned to
classroom space and provide one more room that can alleviate some of the
scheduling issues that arise every semester. The rooms out
in Lysaker are not ideal classrooms, and yet, we have had to put classes
out there when we have run out of options. I am also copying this to Barb Cournia who has the
responsibility for classroom scheduling. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dowell 116 |
Medal, Don |
I'd like to make something less muddied, if not clear. I have heard so many statements about
DH116. The following are my opinions
only, but I think I'm in a special position to make these recommendations. Sink's statement is wrong:
even the expenditure of hundreds of thousands to move all the fiber
wouldn't free up all of that back area as it also serves as a wiring closet
for Dowell Hall, with approximately 900 cables from LAN ports in that
building needing a connection point.
So no matter what we do, not all of DH116 will be available. It also houses fiber equipment owned by
Qwest and Garden Valley, and will continue for the time being to be the
central spot into which all the campus fiber runs. (A trunk cable will connect Kiehle to DH116) This fiber is what Jeff Sinks is talking
about being so expensive to move. We don't need to keep the whole room, however. Long term, only about the back 14 feet of
DH 116 will still be needed for network equipment. This assumes: Air conditioning is rearranged to cover this
space. A secure wall (drywall over plywood would be
fine) is built dividing the room, with a 36" fire rated door, and A concrete block wall be built under the
raised flooring to block access that might otherwise be gained by going thru
the sub-floor. Windows should be either bricked up or
otherwise made both impenetrable and unbreakable. This would leave a space of approximately 17 by 17 feet
available, and will actually leave the equipment in the smaller room more
secure. This said, it seems now likely that the server equipment won't
move til June of 2003, which would BARELY leave time for occupancy in fall
2003. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dowell 116 |
Svec, Andrew |
I seem to
recall back when plans were first being made for the Kiehle Project that
Dowell 116, the current server room, or at least part of that room would
still be needed as a "transfer point" for the campus network.
Since most of the campus network is already wired there, the thought at that
time was that at least that back part should probably remain an access/transfer
port for the campus network. I remember that concept being stated
several times in those early stages. I don't know if that has
changed, since I was no longer on that planning group when Diane Moen became
the CIO--but she may not have been aware of that. It might be
worthwhile to check with Jeff Sinks or someone on the tech side to see if all
or part of that room will still be needed or if that initial concept has
changed. Just thought I'd pass that along |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dowell Annex |
Odom, Marsha |
I have read
Jim's space request and have spoken to him briefly about it. Additional
information. Paul Holm (second floor
Dowell Annex - down the hall from DeMuth's current office) will be retiring
sometime fairly soon. When that
happens, we could allocate that office space to either David or to the
research center space. Jim T.(second
floor Dowell Annex) could be moved into George's old office in SCC (near my
office) when George moves back to Keihle and the new chemistry instructor
could take Jim's old office. It would keep
the science math faculty together and Pam Elf and Soo Yin Lim Thompson's (
and hopefully the new chem instructor's) students involved in research could
also use the facilities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dowell Annex |
Thomasson, Jim |
I think you
would need to put David in my space and the Chemistry prof in David's current
space, so that David can be adjacent to and hopefully open to the Research
Center. Also, while involving
students in research is important, the emphasis of our initiative is to
promote research as one of the three significant components of faculty
responsibility. Faculty are a major
focus of the effort to create a "culture of research". |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dowell Hall ? |
Brorson, Bruce |
let me
suggest a couple changes that I would like to see in the Dowell Hall physical
facilities to support instruction in the Center for Business and Technology
and specifically the ITM degree options. 1. I would like to see our existing lab, DH 214, divided in half to accommodate two additional faculty offices. With that change, we would be able to group four full time faculty members in the very same space and allow for greater interaction. Dan Lim, Niaz Mahmood, Martin Lundel, and myself would all benefit from this change. 2. My current office, DH 217 needs to be repurposed to a server room for support of the ITM program. We'll be better able to isolate ITM student learning by segregating our traffic from the regular traffic of the UMC network, thus assuring higher levels of adherence to policies from the Twin Cities campus without damaging the relationship we have with students and supporting their inquisitive nature. By creating this resource we'll better prepare for upcoming proposals in Network Security Administration as well as emerging developments in the industry. 3. And finally, I would like to reconfigure and repurpose DH 201 from a general purpose classroom into a lab to support ITM instruction. Today's small lab is busy from early in the morning until late in the evening and is equipped with only six workstation/servers because of space limitation. We need space to accommodate at least 15 to 20 and 201 would be about the right size to do just that. With
the addition of more classroom space on the first floor I would hope
that the above suggestions would not disrupt overall class
scheduling. Let me know what you think. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hill |
Nelson, Richard |
5. Hill 209 B – Will become a Ag/NatR faculty
office or adjunct office (two can share).
When open positions (AgBus and Hort).are filled, Ag/NatR will have no
available adjunct space for adjunct instructors. Without air conditioning, 209 B is unsuitable for year-round
use as an office. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hill |
Nelson, Richard |
1. Second
floor Hill is unsatisfactory space for summer offices. 205 (Holder) and
207 (Rahman) were to be air conditioned as part of the last space plan, but
I was told that it would be more cost effective to do the work after
roof repairs were made. That being done now, is air conditioning in the
plan for this spring? 2. Last
time around, everyone seemed to agree that the mix of uses in
Owen 118 is an unsatisfactory long-term arrangement from the academic as
well as safety perspectives. Does the Keihle renovation provide a
new home for Art? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hill |
Odom, Marsha |
I just read some information regarding space
requests. I don't know when decisions
are being made on those, but I am concerned that we must not let our art
classroom space be adversely affected.
The planning committee for Kiehle did not include any final plans for
art, so art will not be moved to Kiehle. Owen 118
is ideal in many ways for an Art Room.
It has the plumbing and wiring needed. It has easy access to the outside. When the trailer can be moved out, it has the space
necessary. There are limited areas on campus that could meet the
physical needs of Art. The top floor
of Hill has the venting and plumbing.
Maybe that space could be re-arranged to accommodate Art. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hill ? |
Kreager, Russ |
I would like to
request a portion of the lower level storage room in Hill that Media Services
is currently using. The need is to store our 2 year supply of catalogs. We
would not store any other Adm/FA items |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hill 12, 113 |
Nelson, Richard |
New Ag Business Program Manager will require office space (can
(likely be addressed shuffling of current users of Hill 12 and 113) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hill 205, 207 |
Nelson, Richard |
1. Hill 205,207 – Without air conditioning, the west
side of Hill Hall is not suitable for use as office space during the summer
months. The temperature on 2nd floor Hill last summer routinely
rose above 90 degrees by early afternoon. Telling faculty to move on those
days when it is too hot to use their regular offices is not an acceptable
solution. It is my understanding that
air conditioning will be installed now that roof repairs are complete. If the Committee verifies that this is the
case, no further action is required or recommended. If air conditioning is not to be installed, the faculty
currently in those offices must be provided alternative permanent space. If the latter course is chosen, the
‘domino effect’ will impact others; it will likely not be limited to Ag/NatR
personnel. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hill 7 |
Myers, Ken |
- The new SRM
faculty would take the office Brian had. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hill, Selvig |
Nelson, Richard |
3. Cross-Functional Collaboration & Co-Location – The present
RFP appears to be a limited effort designed to address short-term campus
needs (i.e. getting through Bede construction). However, pressure to generate new revenue and enhance
institutional visibility and value as a public good will intensify. Incremental
improvement will help us get along, but true innovation is needed to get
ahead. It has been previously
suggested that co-locating (or closely locating) the Center for Agriculture
and Natural Resources, the Center for Adult Learning, and the NW District
Extension Office could spark such innovation. Co-location in Hill (lower level) or Selvig 2 is still worthy
of consideration if the narrow scope of the current RFP is expanded. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kiehle |
Almlie, Curt |
I am not sure if you want this
information for Space Committee, but this the current understanding of the
utilization of space in Kiehle (personnel only) April 9, 2002 Kiehle
Building Room Assignments to date: Room 115 Rose Ulseth, Patti Tiedemann, Sue Dwyer Room 115A Mike Meyers Room 115B Ardis Thompson Room 115C Curt Almlie Room 117 Del Roelofs Room 119 Storage or Liz Tollefson Room 120 Andrew Svec, John Zak Room 125 Linda Wilkens Room 151 Tom Sondreal Room 153-55 Dennis Magsam Room 150 Jeff Sinks, Mike Hanson, Kristi Puppe Room 130 Don Medal Room 138 Dale Kemble Room 140 Jeff Sperling Room 141-43 Rebekah Strotroen, Sarah Riewer Room 142 Fred Eldredge Room 137 Peg Sherven Room 139 ? Room 231 George French Room
241-45 Library |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Owen |
Nelson, Richard |
New Hort faculty member will require office space. Wagner is entering a phased retirement
agreement and will remain on staff. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Owen |
Nelson, Richard |
Owen 204 and 206 (Loegering and Baird, respectively) require air
conditioning as has been provided in
202 (Svedarsky). In the short term Hill 7 (Arscott) may need to be reassigned
to meet Ag/NatR needs. In the longer
term, as described in the previously submitted proposal, it could be part of
a more meaningful change initiative between Ag/NatR, CAL, and Extension to
share resources and build capacity for new revenue generation. Summary The short lead time for this RFP did not allow an inclusive
group of users of Owen and Hill Halls to thoughtfully and creatively share
ideas, weigh options, or discuss objectives.
A more comprehensive plan for Owen and Hill halls is needed to improve
space utilization, enhance the work and learning environment, and expand
service quality and revenue potential.
Such a plan would include changes in Owen 104, 108 and 118, several
rooms on second floor Owen (including the space now occupied by Extension and
two adjunct offices), all of Hill Hall, and (possibly) second floor
Selvig. With some shuffling, current Ag/NatR office space (including
Hill 7 and 113, and 209B) should be adequate to “get through”. However, more innovative thinking will be
needed to “get better”. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Owen ? |
Petithomme, Joas; Cavalier, Don |
I would like to request an appropriate office space for the
Diversity Program for Fall Semester 2002.
Diversity services should have adequate, suitably located office,
technology, and equipment to support its mission and goals. Presently the
Diversity office space is located in the adjunct professor’s area that is not
private and convenient for the functioning of this office. Many of the activities offered by
diversity student programs and services require some level of privacy. It is important that the physical office
space be adequate for these purposes.
The ideal private office space would be location in or closer to the
One-Stop Counseling and Career Services Office in Owen Hall |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Owen 104 |
Nelson, Richard |
· The following
apply to the specific rooms noted in the current RFY and/or to known needs
not included in that document. 4. Owen 104 – Clean up is underway.
104 will return to its previous usefulness as lab prep area for PIM-Agro.
If plans to move Art (#2, above) go forward, Owen 104, 118, and 108
should be considered together in a comprehensive plan to improve space
utilization and create a better learning environment in that entire section
of the building. Addressing the
problems in 104 is essential, but the most significant benefits will only be
realized with an integrated approach that includes 118 and 108 (two of the
worst classrooms on campus) as well as 104. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Owen 118 |
Aakre, Paul |
If Owen 118 is
going be remodeled in some fashion, please do not forget about the need for a
proper storage area for the Survey trailer. This trailer contains
$1000,s of dollars of equipment that needs to be stored in a dry location,
plus it must be very accessible during fall semester as it is taken out and
used two times per week. Owen 118 has provided a good location.
It must not be assumed that the trailer can be moved into the remaining Mech
Ag bay (Owen 118). This lab is dangerously overcrowded as it is since
the loss of the welding lab. This situation must also be looked at in
the near future. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Owen 118 |
Nelson, Richard |
2. Owen 118 – Valid concerns were raised during the last space
utilization assessment regarding the incompatible mix of uses currently in
the room. Chief among these were
safety and academic deficiencies related to Art instruction. It is my understanding that we were to
make the best of a poor situation pending completion of the Keihl project
which would include new space for Art.
If that remains the case, no further action is required or
recommended. If the Kiehl project
does not directly or indirectly include new space for Art, then the Committee
needs to revisit the matter. Once Art
is moved to more suitable quarters, plans to redesign 118 for a better mix if
uses can go forward. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Owen 118 |
Odom, Marsha |
I just read some information regarding space requests. I don't know when decisions are being made
on those, but I am concerned that we must not let our art classroom space be
adversely affected. The planning
committee for Kiehle did not include any final plans for art, so art will not
be moved to Kiehle.
Owen 118 is ideal in many ways for an Art Room. It has the plumbing and wiring
needed. It has easy access to the
outside. When the trailer can be moved
out, it has the space necessary. There are limited areas on campus that
could meet the physical needs of Art.
The top floor of Hill has the venting and plumbing. Maybe that space could be re-arranged to
accommodate Art. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Owen 222 |
2000 Space Committee Recommendation |
Convert
222 into a space that will have multiple uses for a 24 student
classroom. The design will require new tables with wiring to each
table, a new instructor station, and carpet and paint. The
possibility of wiring the room so a switch can close down the LAN ports
will be explored. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Robertson |
Hier, Leela |
Just to clarify the amount of space the bookstore will need
during relocation. The bookstore currently has 1750 sq feet (not including
storage space). It would be difficult to find equivalent space to
accommodate the bookstore and Robertson seems to be the best choice. When I
talked to Kent Freberg, one possibility for the bookstore was rooms 114 &
112 in Robertson. There is an old doorway between the 2 rooms that has
been sealed but Kent felt this could be opened up and the current door out of
112 sealed to make the exit through room 112. Also room 111 would be
needed for storage (we have to buy a pallet of paper at a time which
is 40 cases; 7 years of bookstore records as mandated by the auditors,
extra shelving, filing cabinets, displays, etc). Rooms 114 & 112
would be approximately 1040 sq. ft. which is 40% less
space. Bookstore inventory and services would drastically have to
be cut back which intern means revenue will drop dramatically. ·
Pam and I both express the following financial concerns
regarding: · moving the security camera (bookstore and lounge-rewire to Robertson) · moving all furniture including textbook shelves, workstation, cash register area, clothing fixtures & displays, · track lighting, security door chime) ·
moving and installing Point-of-Sale system ·
moving inventory ·
remodeling Robertson to accommodate bookstore needs (opening
doorway between room 114 & 112; sealing · the door in room 112, putting up standards for grid displays, installing textbook shelving, setting up workstation, ·
installing track lighting, installing security camera,
installing security door chime, phone lines for incoming calls, ·
credit card & fax) ·
wiring Robertson for Point-of-Sale system ·
access for freight shipments at Robertson |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SCC 113 |
Myers, Ken |
I would like to
request the following to be discussed: 1- The
office George French is in: Move
David Seyfried into it. (Doug had mentioned this idea. I think related to
another possible need for his office, but I’m not sure on that). And the
following had already been planned. - The office
Vern was in: Will be for the new HRI faculty. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
O:\Committees\Space\SpaceReview02.doc